According to Rotten Tomatoes, the worst film in the franchise “Lord of Rings”

The Lord of the Rings is a franchise that critics and fans love. Movies posted in the Medemic land tend to work well in the box office, Collect streaming pairs without problemsAnd many are considered the main materials for revision. However, the recent addition to the Tolkienian Cinematographic Tolkienian officially noted Rotten Tomatoes as an insightful “Ring Lord”.

“The Lord of the Rings: Rahirim’s War” established a new record of the franchise “Lord of the Rings” of 48% on tomatometer. This is the most important consensus (unlike the popcornmeter that evaluates the audience’s audience answers), and it can be said much for the Warner Bros., which had greatness but could not stick to the landing.

“Rokhirim’s War” became the first raid in the anime for the movie about the middle ground. History has been going on for centuries before the “ruler of the rings” and tells about the creation of a deep helm. While it has excellent music and Features of multiple camerasThe movie is hard for fans Fairweather to follow the items and was a very low budget. Critics responded with a strong average rating. For the sake of justice, the fact that the number of 48% is a low franchise, speaks of the popularity of the works of Tolkien and Good for other medium -sized projects. For the context, let’s see how the rocirical anime director Kenny Kamama compares with some other cinematic classics.

Let’s start with the obvious comparison. How does the Rokhirim War oppose Peter Jackson’s original trilogy? According to Rotten Tomatoes, critics kill “Rings Scholarships”, “Two Towers” and “King’s Return” make up 92%, 95%and 94%respectively. This is a suitable trilogy of high scores, which reflects the obvious aura that surrounds these iconic movies about the middle ground.

The Hobbit trilogy, which is also the Warner Bros. project, is where everything starts to slip. “Hobbit: Unexpected journey”, “Hobbit: devastation of Smouga” and “Hobbit: Battle of Five Armies” comes by 64%, 74%and 59%, respectively, with the final work with this trilogy, which marks Warner Bros. Low – that is, before the release of “Rokhirim War” exactly ten years later.

Another part of the puzzle about the living action that you can consider here is the main video “Lord of the Rings: Rings of Strength”. It is difficult to compare because it comes from another studio and is in a serialized streaming format. However, it is interesting to compare because the critics received a warm answer to the second age, which has a score of 84% after the season 2.

Movies live, such as “Lord of Rings” and “Hobbit” trilogies and series “Rings” are not the only screen manifestations of the world of Tolkien. Over the years, other studios have also tried to capture this magic of medium-sized land, especially in three full-length films (some made for theatrical run, others to release direct television). If you take into account those who are in the equation, the race becomes a little tougher, even if the “Rokhirim War” remains below the critical ratings.

One of these animated colleagues-Rankin and Bass “Hobbit”, which came out in 1977 and still supports an impressive score of 71% of the tomato. In 1978, Ralph Bakshi released his reception in Tolkien in the form of “lord of the rings” (animation that only told part of its title history). This project was the lowest ranking adaptation of the middle ground before the Rogirim War, 49% Rotten Tomatoes (just one percent above the new anime). Finally, there is an animation “Return of the King” Rankin and Bass since 1980, which criticized 67%. While technically higher than the Rogirim War, these previous projects are willing to the general lower reception of the animated medium -sized land. In a sense, they established a mediocre precedent, and the new anime just went with an example.

It is a well -known fact that sometimes There are huge gaps between critics’ opinions and audiencesAnd Rotten Tomatoes accepted help for it. This alternative based on the audience tells a completely different story when it comes to movies about middle ground and streaming series. Here are the results of the audience for all 11 projects mentioned earlier to the lowest:

• “Scholarship Ring”: 95%
• “Two Towers”: 95%
• “King’s return” (live action): 86%
• “Hobbit: Smoop”: 85%
• “Hobbit: Unexpected Travel”: 83%
• “War Rohirim”: 82%
• “Hobbit: Battle of Five Armies”: 74%
• “Hobbit” (animated): 65%
• “Lord of the Rings” (animated): 64%
• “Power Rings”: 49%
• “King’s return” (animated): 39%

There are some interesting things here. First, the “Rokhirim War” jumps from another to the middle of the flock with a solid 82% of the audience. We also get the lowest overall assessment, and Rankin and the bass -initiated “King’s Return”, which fell into 30. The “Ring Forces” series is also almost twice with critical 84% to 49% of the audience. The only sense of sequence between the two rating systems is not surprising that the original trilogy “Lord of the Rings” Peter Jackson remains above (though in a slightly different order) where he continues to set the gold standard, not just for medium -sized land adaptations, but all Cinematographic fantastic projects of the 21st century.