A bombshell judgment on Marine Le Pen

Open the Editor’s Marking Free

Rulla Khalaf, the FT editor, chooses its preferred stories in this week’s news.

Convention to the judges of being extremely mild to the criminals is an unconstitutional staple for remote political figures of France. They needed another line of attack on Monday. The Criminal Court of Paris has imposed the maximum punishment as much as possible in Marine Le pen, to master the EU funds. Le Pen has been sentenced to two years in prison – or at least e-label, two more suspended, fined for 100,000 euros Five yearsIn a number, the ban seriously endangers the candidacy of Lee Theater for the 2027 presidential election, which would be its fourth application for the Elysee Palace, probably more favorable.

Le penAllies attacked severe punishment as a violent judicial predominance. The court not only “unfairly” condemned the leader of the “National Aquisition” party, but also to “executed” democracy, and falsified his deputy Jordan Bardela. All European populist leaders came in. The Kremlin was angry with erosion of democratic standards. More surprising, even in France, some Pen’s Pen’s political enemies have condemned the court to deprive the voters the right to vote.

The court, however, fulfilled the case of behavioral rules for the selected office. The EU and the French authorities have started studying the requirements of RN officials for decades. Prosecutors have evidenced great evidence that nine former lawmakers and their assistants are consciously and abusing more than 4 million euros in European parliamentary funds for French political activities. Le Pen played a central role in fraud in 2009, The court foundPoliticians from a number of central modem party were previously convicted of such crimes.

The question is whether Barring Le pen, even before his appeal, is a fair punishment. It was not automatic. The decision of the court ruling, presiding judge Benedik de Peswis noted that the punishment should be a proportion. Given the role of Le Pen to make electoral policy in the favor of his party, the judge concluded that it was. He also argued that this would divide the rule of law if Lere pen could avoid punishment, winning the presidency, after which the courts will be reluctant to punish. In fact, the court decided that all French voters’ rights that will study the elections dominated the right of a certain candidate’s voting.

Even so, political influences Le Pen’s Debarring could be far away. He is convinced that he applies to Donald Trump to depict himself as a victim of a confirmation conspiracy, hoping to shoot his supporters and to defeat President Emanuel Macon and main parties. The Trump’s administration can be well frowned to conduct democratic rights in France, as far as Romania made to exclude the candidate for the prospective president. But unlike Romanian work, Leen pen was convicted by a court.

Le Pen can take revenge by raising the minority government that runs Centrist François BayrouA number of modem leader, he was acquitted by the involvement of his party’s EU funding, but prosecutors capture the decision. Even if Le Pen’s legal complaints fail, RN can still grow stronger under Bardel. Slick Communicator does not have Le Pen’s experience, but also the record of his presidential propaganda failures.

The disqualification of Le Pen will make the French policy more burning. But the case of the court is not in order to make political decisions. In order for this to be accused, it shows how respectful the rule of law as a fundamental principle of democracy.