Why Mickey 17 – the best performance of Robert Patinson for today

Believe it or not, once Robert Patinson was not considered the chief actor. Sad, but true! For the sake of justice, there were many emollient factors that surrounded this, the main one among them the fact that he exploded on the stage when the men’s presenter in the “Twilight” saga, being in the epicenter of this dubious pop cultural phenomenon. Despite the horde shouting young fans who amaze an English actor based on his beauty (and the fulfillment of his “dusk”, Edward Cullen, imagined), the dismissal of Pattinson Snwaty at the time (including, unfortunately, my past) helped us to teach us a valuable lesson. taste.

After all, almost immediately after his stay in the films “Twilight”, Patinson used his new setting to become a star with which he needs to be considered. He doubled in collaboration with a brain Canadian lawyer David Kurnenberg appearing in both “Cosmopolis” and “Maps to Stars.” This double Whammy signaled his interest in working with complex, independent, Orthochi directors, and from there he continued to appear in films similar to Brad Corbeth, James Gray, Safdi’s Brothers, Claire Danny and Robert Eges. Even when he decided to delve into the main material of the blockbuster, it was with Christopher Nolan (for “tenet”) and Matt Reves, who gave him a brand new group shouting fans by throwing it like New Bruce Wayne in Batman. (As recently noticed PattinsonThese fans are now preferably men but not less crazy.)

During his career on the Pattinson screen, he has repeatedly proved his acting chops, and this very involves his work in the “Twilight” saga. Although he did a fantastic work in a number of properly respected films, he feels that he has not yet reached the role of signature, or perhaps even surpassing Edward in the public consciousness, although the horses in “Good Time” and Winnslow in the “Lighthouse” approached. However with the release of the last movie Patinson, “Mickey 17” Bong John Hona Hona This achievement has come.

The actor’s performance in “Mickey 17” is absolutely wonderful, and it is likely that he will become a new benchmark for his entire work that follows.

On paper, the role of Mickey Barnes in “Mickey 17” looks like a showcase for the one who eventually plays it. The movie based on the novel “Mickey7” by Edward Ashton, monitors Mickey when he goes on the interstellar journey into the proposed new settlement of the person, the only way he can soon: sign up for “costs”, who legally claims that he is used as a human pig to his death. Most of the movie includes complications that arise when Mickey 17, who left his unreliable friend Tim (Stephen Yun), does not die, though Tim reports on the scientific team ended. Thus, Mickey 17 returns to the ship, just finding his replacement, Mickey 18, which was already reprinted and took his life.

Obviously, the possibilities of “Mickey 17” is presented by the actor. It is not only a science-fiction story with a double role when the actor plays opposite himself, but also a film is a smart satire, where Mickey 17 and 18 represent everything: from the righteous revolutionary to the movie Nouar-Esca Patsi to the figure that carries the weight of humanity on his shoulders. There are many layers to the part, and so thanks to the movie, most actors can get lost in all opportunities. But not Patinson, who demonstrated that he was not an independent actor type, and he is also not a beautiful boy. It is a unique scump over -your ownand In most interviews about the movieHe discussed the various dull approaches he had to character.

Patinson conducted everything that checked everything: from “Jacques” to “silent and stupid” to Steve Buskey in “Fargo” regarding his speech, and all of them are brilliantly subversive elections for the film, which is full of political and social satire. Patinson clearly understands and enjoys the possibilities that give him a role and uses it in each stage as much as possible. But no one ever feels that he is trying to demonstrate himself or selling a character too hard, which testifies to an artist who in his essence knows his skill and his value.

Of course, the work of the screen actor is just as good as his director, and fortunately, Patinson decided to work with another master in Bong John Ho. The fact that Pattinson constantly chooses work with proven directors is even more proof of how much he perceives his skill seriously, because it testifies to how much he is aware that good material presented is good, means that it will look much better. In this regard, director Bong rises to this occasion, giving Pattinson a bunch of big plans (in the IMAX format, not less), and allowing him to perform in several long, continuous. In “Mickey 17”, because Patinson seems to be mutual respect, which is a director, in different states of concern and misfortunes, and Mickey often became ill, beaten, gathered or dying throughout the film.

The most impressive is how director Bong causes several experienced invisible colors from Pattinson’s actor in the film. We saw how Patinson was magical and attractive in many films, we saw his brood, we saw him angry, and we definitely saw him participating in some sexual situations, being in space before (earlier (earlierThank you, “High Life”). However, we rarely saw him pathetic like Mickey 17, and Patinson does not fear this hero gentle. Pattinson may have been assembled to make this choice, given that Mickey 18 is at the other end of the spectrum, its bitter, nihilistic anger in the world and its situation, making it too strong compared. With two Mickey, assembled together, you couldn’t have the best weighted wide range that Patinson has as a leading performer.

Throughout the history history, countless actors were on the selection either in a certain type of role or a certain type of film. Of course, this typical system is a by -product of the business of the show -biz, because virtually any actor, which is worth their salt, can play different roles in a wide range of films. However, most stars typically remain in their data to continue to earn a living in that, at best, an uncertain profession. Thus, the star is rarely encountered regularly between large blockbusters and small indie films. While the majority lowers the toes to others on occasion, not much who balances them.

From “Mickey 17”, Robert Patinson seems to secure his ability to do both, almost immediately. This can cause a little damage, as the film is sold as a wide budget science-fiction adventure (which is allegedly), although the film itself is much deeper and a stranger than today’s audience came to science fiction. Although some people can really see “Mickey 17” and postponed his unfamiliar retreats, others will be enticing victorious charisma and Pattinson’s characters, just to be in the depths of the film and individual idiosyncrasy. Although, of course, the bulk of the loan on “Mickey 17” and its triumph goes to Bong Johon Ho, it must be said that the presence of Patinson is a key good for the film.

Indeed, Patinson laid the foundation not only for the career itself, but also how it is, and it continues to be perceived. All these Shouting adolescent fans during their “twilight”, now adultsAnd he rewarded their loyalty, continuing to push himself, not resting on laurels and popularity. “Mickey 17” is the culminating work of the actor who is engaged in the profession for all the right reasons, and the only thing that more delights than what Pattinson does in the movie is what he can do next.

“Mickey 17” is in cinemas everywhere.