Passage road from Canada’s liberal leadership
BBC News, Toronto

After return-back debates in both English and French, the candidates to replace Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as the leader of the Liberal Party in Canada.
Card holders will now choose between the former Governor of Canada and British banks Mark Carney, former Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, House Governor Karina Gould and businessman and former MP FRANK BAYIS.
Kim, who won the vote on March 9, will be the next Prime Minister of Canada and will lead the liberals in the future general elections to be held on October 20.
A large center of the discussions, which threatened the northern neighbor of America, and offered Canada to the 51st state, how Canadian US President Donald Trump has to respond to Donald Trump, and Canada was 51st State.
Here are five great roads from two liberal leadership arguments.
Trump factor
In Canada, the US President Donald Trump responded to what the “existential threat” responded to what was called “existential threat” was a surprising extent on the agenda.
Trump said that all Canadian exports plan to apply a 25% tariff in all Canadian exports, except for a 10% tariff that economists will be devastating for Canada, said it plans to apply a 25% tariff.
He also suggested that the United States was in Canada in Canada in Canada, who was greeted with excitement and anger of the Canadian population.
A former Prime Minister Freeland, who served in the first term of Trump, won himself an experienced speech and the US president and previous tariffs.
However, CARNEY warned today that the shirt was not a carpet. “He is more prisons. He is more aggressive,” said Carney. “He asked our markets in the past. Now he wants our country.”
Gulould, the youngest candidate, said that he should help the desktop “put everything on the table to protect the sovereignty in Canada and to help the federal government depend on the United States.
Meanwhile, Baylis, Canada, Britain’s Britain, New Zealand and Australia, said that all four states are like-minded countries, cultural and government systems.
How can Canadian economy
Trump’s threats are more excited by the current economic situation in Canada.
Canadians express their frustrations over the value of stubborn living.
Carney – the economist of trade – in three years he will balance the operating budget of Canada and suggested thinking that Canada spends money.
However, he also noted the support of the main liberal programs such as favorable children’s care and dental care.
As former Finance Minister, Freeland defended the freeland road, saying that the country’s finances are still “very strong.” He added that using this point to support Canadian industries and encourage work growth, to capitalize the increase in patriotism in front of Trump’s threats.
Baylis took his experience as a businessman to say that Canada had to work on building productivity.
On the other hand, the Liberal Party must be “real with Canadians” and balancing the budget in three years this is not possible without significant cuts, it is not supported. According to him, Canada should pay attention to “modernize the social security network” to help those who struggle.
“We face extreme threats from the United States, so we must invest in our people and institutions to protect them.”
Conservative leader Pierre to defeat Poilievre
Four candidates argued with each other, but they once a joint opponent, the leader of the Conservative Party Pierre Poilievre, the most likely government of Canada, the most likely opponent in the survey of Canada, the most likely opponent.
Liberal leadership hopes threw a few jabs in Shoilievre throughout the disputes. Freeland called Poilievre to “imitate” it called him “my little version of the house.”
Carney criticized Payilev as “irresponsible” and added that he could “pay” it as a prime minister in Canada.
Poilievre, who created a large lead in a leading polls in a unpopular questionnaires, had to hit the Canadian court since Trudea’s resignation.
His message was from the US to criticize the Prime Minister’s “broken” CANADIA Canada, the Prime Minister, headed by Canada “Canada”. He also changed his attention to attack Carney, who liked to win the Liberal Leadership Race.
Poilievre still sounds national, but some surveys show that the presenters between him and the liberals have been shrunk since Trudea’s speech.

Supports Ukraine and NATO
All four candidates who responded to the US policy ongoing Russia-Ukrainian war confirmed the obligation to continue the support of Canada to Ukraine.
Not all of them, but also in Canada, fulfilling the military spending target, in accordance with the NATO Alliance, and how to reach it.
Freeland should do this by Canada to target by 2027 and by investing in the next Warfare. Baylis and Carney said their plans would have plans to reach this goal until 2030.
Both Freeland and Carney, Canada, said that this money should spend this money to Canadian military institutions instead of the United States.
Freeland said that Canada has reduced confidence in the United States and to provide working with the EU and other NATO partners.
Reconstruction of consumer tax in carbon
Tax in carbon for consumers and enterprises, Trudeau government was the foundation of the policy of climate change in climate change.
However, this tax proved that the Canadians are not popular with Canadians, promised to promise the policy of politics that force Carney and Freeland to force.
An old UN climate movement and old special envoy Carney, a special envoy, was a supporter of carbon taxes. In the discussions, he recognized the tax on the division of consumers, and instead, he said he was aimed at large pollutants and clean energy projects in Canada.
Freeland, who resigned from the government of Trudeau, said that due to the difference between the Prime Minister on spending, he will be able to judge a favorably despite the popularity of the history of the history. But he also promised to break carbon taxes.
“Democracy is going to listen to people, and the Canadians were very clear with us because they did not think that politics work for them,” he said.
On the other hand, Gould and Baylis said they would keep some version of consumer tax in carbon, saying that he struggled with climate change.