Trump should not be allowed to remain Palestine’s right | Israeli-Palestine conflict

Before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to the White House, the United States President Donald Trump said the Palestinians “alternative”, but “alternative” to leave Gaza. When the two leader met in the Oval office, Trump said, “will seize the United States after the Palestinians were transferred to the Gaza Strip. The President also expressed the desire to convert the occupied territory to the Middle East to Riviera.

These surrealistic statements called on Tuesday because the Palestinians were an unprecedented destruction of the Israeli army throughout the Israeli army. Most released and expelled in the last two weeks, and most of which they could return to their homes found only ruins. According to the United Nations, the Israeli army bombed 90 percent of all Housing units In the Gaza Strip, 160,000 and 276,000 were more or partially damaged by 276,000 people.

As seen in the main media of dust and the rating of the rubble, the severity of Goyör to kill, killing and destroying, killing and destroying, but also not to stay. And this is the opportunity to ensure this right, Trump-Netanyahu duo is now the probability that it is bent to prevent.

Remains as a right

The right to stay is not officially recognized as part of the Human Rights Canon and is allowed to remain in a country where they are generally fled from their country and seek refuge. Basically, the marginal and unusual city residents demanded the rights to stay in their homes when they face the pressure of strong actors in their homes and societies. The right to stay, especially urgently important in the engine situations where the colonops are actively changed and replaced by IDPs. Aboriginal and Torres Throat Islander people in Australia in North America used genocide violence to deny the local people who settled in Australia.

But the right to stay, it’s not just the right to “put”. On the contrary, people must be able to get in the society of people to enjoy and receive both material and social “infrastructure, including water and meals, places, schools, places of worship, and livelihood. It is impossible to stay without infrastructure.

Also, the right to stay outside of physical existence, also covers the right to protect historical and modernity Stories and relationships Keeps people and communities in place and on time. This is an important aspect of this right, because the residential-colonial project only aims to remove and modify local people, but also wants to delete local cultures, dates and identities and individuals. Finally, it is not enough to remain a resident of the besieged area. The right to stay includes the ability to determine your own destiny of a nation.

Regular displacement date

During the war of 1948, the majority of Palestinian cities were refugees in neighboring countries, about 500 Palestinian villages collapsed and about 500 Palestinian villages were destroyed. In total, about 900,000 people were expelled from about 750,000 Palestinian homes and ancestors and never allowed to return. Since then, the danger of displacement or displacement has been part of the daily Palestinian experience. Indeed, Palestinian communities are forcibly rooted in places like Umm Al Hiran within the occupied West Bank and even in Israel and prevent them from returning their land.

The rejection of the US-supported Israeli rights to remain in the Gaza Strip is not only because of the refugees, because it is the second, third or fourth displacement, but also displacement has now become a vehicle. October 13, 2023, Israel, Wadi, Wadi gave a collective evacuation for 1.1 million Palestinians in the north of Gaza, which was time to change 90 percent of the population in the next few months.

To be sure, the International Humanitarian Law prevents parties to protect the civilian population, which allows to protect the convicted civilian population. Again, these provisions are the right to stay in the homes of populations, and therefore, the end of the war, when the return of any form of illegal displacement, it is reported that the return should be allowed to end. The transfer of the population should be temporary and only for protection and humanitarian relief, as Israel uses and Trump’s latest comments, “Humanitarian camouflage“To cover wholesale destruction and liquidation of Palestinian areas.

The right to stay and the right to self-determination

Now the ceasefire was announced, the expelled Palestinians can return to where they live. Again, this action does not satisfy the rights of staying back in any way. This is not a coincidence: The ability to stay is clear that Israel aims to eliminate the 15-month war.

Hospitals, schools, universities, mosques, shops and street markets, roads, wells, electric nets, greenhouses and fishing vessels, greenhouses and fishing vessels were not carried out in mass killings and temporary cleaning services, but also in the spot in the spot in the North Gaza to create reality. Thus, this is not only the destruction of Palestinian houses, but the existence of the population is not compromising for years to come.

This is not something new. Throughout history, we saw how the settlements were moving to allow for permanent displacement and local populations. We know that we know that there will be no financial investments in the reconstruction of these stories, and the infrastructure will not be financial investments – make the right to stay in the population. Determines the remaining self-determination. To apply the right to stay alive, Palestinians must finally win their freedoms as people who define themselves.

Israel has rejected the right to Palestinians for more than 75 years. It’s a lot of time to fix everything. Any discussion about the future of Gaza must lead the claims and desires of the Palestinian people. The promises of reconstruction and economic prosperity by foreign countries are inappropriate until Palestine is associated with self-determination. The right to stay can only be secured by decolonization and Palestine freedom.

The views shown in this article are unique and definitely reflect the editorial position of Gazir.