AI-edited images and movies can still be copyrighted, advises the US Agency
There are many legal and ethical debates related to AI -generated images and videos, and the questions surrounding the copyright are at the top of the list. On Wednesday, the US Copyright Office released a New report This is trying to provide some clarity about the question of whether AI and AI-edited images can be copyrighted.
The report claims that copyright “protects the original expression in a work created by a human author, even if the work also includes AI material generated by AI.” Images that are fully generated with AI still do not meet the requirements for copyright protection.
The report is the second of a series of the Copyright Service, and this edition focuses specifically on what it calls “copyright” of AI and AI-edited images generated. The office first issued guidance around AI in March 2023, followed by a series of online listening sessions to contribute to their thoughts. The series will have three reports; The first was released last July and dealt with AI replicasLike DeepFakes and Robocalls, posing as politicians.
The arguments and recommendations in these reports are not a law, but give us a certain idea of ​​how the agency looks at it, or in this case, by developing, its guidelines to take into account the legal and ownership of the challenges of new AI technologies.
One of the main things that the copyright office emphasizes is the level of contribution of a person, which means how practically a real person is during the creation process. This is important because, as the report is correctly calling, a very popular editing software has recently been obtained AI Power UpdatesS Things like the tools to define in the film features for postproduction and editing photos that clean up unwanted items and photo bombers have existed for years, but some of them now use AI, in the horror of some creatorsS
This kind of auxiliaries AI is different from a person Writing a complex prompt For AI image generator and as such, the use of this AI editing program should not interfere with a director or photographer from reserving copyright on his works. “There is an important distinction between the use of AI as a tool to support the creation of works and the use of AI as a willingness for human creativity,” the report said.
On the other hand, AI images are not copyrighted, as the copyright service claims that the final images are still the “interpretation” of AI’s prompted person. The same prompt can lead to endless and different results, which means that AI has a more involved in the act of creation.
So far, guidelines such as US agencies and judgments have created a kind of Hodge-Podge legal framework for creators when it comes to AI images and videos. The new year and the new administration can bring new legislation or changes, but we will have to wait and see.
For more information about AI, see Everything we know so far about Deepseek and How to turn off Apple IntelligenceS