The emergency stop will save lives. Auto -producers want to charge further for this

Rate this post


The most challenging part of the FMVSS 127 is the test for automatic emergency pedestrians (PAEB) at night, which, unlike the new EU regulation on AEB, has to work in complete darkness. More than 70 percent of pedestrians hit and killed by drivers are bumped at night, according to NHTSA.

Pedestrian protection at night “will probably require further progress and development of sensory technology,” said Nadine Wong, director of track testing at an independent testing company Dynamic examinationS Working from a test track 15 miles north of Bakersfield, California, Dynamic Research already conducts FMVSS 127 testing For clients. “We know that there are currently available vehicles that are already approaching the standard,” said WongS

NHTSA admits that FMVSS 127 is “technologically forced”, but stresses that “the standard is practically applicable.”

While the industry will be at the $ 354 million hook in mainly software development costs, US society will earn up to $ 7.26 billion, Nhsta says, citing costs to costs for “Negative external effects” serious car accidents such as calling emergency, medical care, insurance administrative expenses, workplace expenses and legal expenses.

“Given that automotive is the largest manufacturing sector in America, it employs 10 million Americans, generates 5 percent of US GDP and puts $ 1 trillion in the economy a year,” says Chase, “it is remarkable that (it is remarkable that ( the automotive industry) could not meet the requirements of the AEB rule until September 2029. “

In a a statement about the press, William Wallace, a Consumer Report safety protection director, agreed: “It’s very disappointing that car manufacturers are suing to block this life -saving rule for automatic emergency braking.”

Sean Kildar, Director of Research at Supporters of road and cars safetyagreed. “When they say,” it’s impractical, we can never fulfill this standard, “it’s a lie because some car companies already sell vehicles in the US that they do,” he says, “and definitely sell vehicles abroad that it They do. (Car companies) just don’t want to pay for every vehicle. “

However, the Alliance’s Bozzella called the FMVSS 127 “catastrophic” rule, which “endlessly-and unnecessary-will disappoint drivers (s) will make vehicles more expensive.” Somewhat strange, Bozzella also claims that the stricter standard, more, more -Strog even from the equivalent in the EU, “it will not really improve the safety of the driver or pedestrian.”

However, the alliance’s work must fail, Chees says. “NHTSA avoids risk. They like everything fastened. They would not expose this rule if they thought it could be easily disputed.

At the end of last year, NHTSA publishes a set of studies Which shows that more than 860,000 lives have been rescued by federal safety standards for motor vehicles since 1968. Only front airbags have saved more than 50,000 lives over a period of 30 years, predicts NHTSAS

President Trump has been nominated Steven Bradbury be a secretary of transport. Bardbury is an associate in the right brain Trust Heritage Foundation who writes Project 2025A project of over 900 pages for a government that Trump denied during the election.

Project 2025 transport plans include reducing fuel economy standards and eliminating highways from pedestrian and bicycle projects. Project 2025 was also in favor of a smaller government and less regulations, a request that is likely to be charged by Ilon Musk’s Government Efficiency Departmentor Doge.

It is not clear what President Trump, Dot or Doge will do with FMVSS 127, but, says Norton, the author also autonomous driving book“If we can’t get car manufacturers to accept the automation of safety vehicles, then we can’t expect them to take them seriously about fully robotic cars.”

 
Report

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *