Harry says’ ” Sounded ” for low treatment
Prince Harry was unfair when he was deprived of English security details, and his lawyer told the judges of the Court of Appeal in London on Tuesday.
Harry, who made a rare appearance in court, lost the state funded protection after the role of the state family as a member of the state family in February 2020 and moved to the United States
Last year, the decision of the government panel’s “Bespoke” security was not illegal, irrational or unfounded for the decision to provide the necessary government panel on the basis for their visits to the UK.
However, the lawyer witness Fatima, a group that assessed the security needs of Sussex could not watch its process and could not implement the risk management assessment.
“Appellant is that it means that it means better.” Said Fatima. “In fact, in his presentation, it means that he left between it for different, unfounded and low treatment.”
Harry, who entered the hoods of Sussex Duke, was wearing a blue suit and light blue tie because he sat behind his lawyer. The appearance of his surprise was an indicator of the importance of work for him.
King Charles’s young son Harry, the government and the tabloid press to court, gave a court to court, a mixed note.
However, Harry rarely shows the court to the court by entering only a few years in the last two years. This included the trial of telephone hacking situations against English tabloids when the first major member of the witness box in a century.
Harry and the family of the family claims
Harry, his homeland and his wife Meghan, the duchess of Sussex, the dumps of Sussex and the news of the news media claimed to damage the homeland.
When in the UK, a police claimed to be able to pay an individual for a police officer, but after the argument of a government lawyer, officials should not be used as “private bodyguards for riches.”
He also threw a knife situation against the broadcasting of a daily post office for an article that said he was trying to hide his efforts to continue receiving the government’s financed security.
However, in 2023, he won a victory against the Daily Mirror publisher and found that the referee was “wide and ordinary” in the telephone hacking.
Prince Harry announces victory after the British British judge said that the British broadcaster was a victim of Hacking by the Mirror Group newspapers.
In January, Rupert Murdoch’s British tabloids have accepted to pay a reasonable apology in their lives for years and to resolve the confidentiality and occupation claim.
There is a similar job that looks against the publisher of the Daily Mail.
English